Topic
|
Source
|
Link
|
Health - including sound
|
Sleep
(Peer-reviewed journal)
|
Noise-induced sleep disruption from wind turbines: scientific updates and acoustical standards (2024)
This study concludes that modern wind turbines do not pose a risk to sleep when developed with reasonable restrictions. Noise from wind turbines measured outside the residence, up to 46 dBA) or modelled up to 49 dBA using the new standard), poses no risk to human sleep. Not at this audible range, nor its associated infrasound or low-frequency noise levels.
|
|
Environmental Health Perspectives
(Peer-reviewed journal)
|
The Health Effects of 72 Hours of Simulated Wind Turbine Infrasound: A Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Study in Noise-Sensitive, Healthy Adults (2023)
Australian researchers placed participants in a room with speakers for a 72-hour-long period, sometimes activating the speakers to play wind turbine-like infrasound. The researchers investigated the participants’ sleep quality when exposed to infrasound.
|
|
The Journal of Acoustical Society of America
(Peer-reviewed journal)
|
Annoyance, perception, and physiological effects of wind turbine infrasound (2021)
Finnish researchers recruited people who lived near wind turbines and placed them in a loudspeaker-walled chamber. Inside, the participants were exposed to infrasound noise simulating what one might experience standing 200 metres (650 feet) or 1,500 metres (4,900 feet) away from a wind turbine. Participants could not discern whether or not infrasound was playing, and the researchers couldn’t find any evidence that infrasound elicited responses in participants’ heart rates or nervous systems.
|
|
Scientific Reports
(Peer-reviewed journal)
|
A longitudinal, randomized experimental pilot study to investigate the effects of airborne infrasound on human mental health, cognition, and brain structure (2021)
This study asked participants to keep a speaker in their bedroom for 28 nights, during which researchers would play infrasound to half the participants. The researchers investigated whether there were changes in that infrasound-exposed group’s behaviour, including their self-reported health, their sleep, and their cognitive abilities.
|
|
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
(Peer-reviewed journal)
|
Wind Turbines and Health: A Critical Review of the Scientific Literature (2014)
The literature review found that components of wind turbine sound, including infrasound and low frequency sound, have not been shown to present unique health risks to people living near wind turbines.
|
|
Environmental Health
(Peer-reviewed journal)
|
Health effects and wind turbines: A review of the literature (2011)
Conclusions of the peer reviewed literature found that to date, no peer reviewed articles demonstrate a direct causal link between people living in proximity to modern wind turbines, the noise they emit and resulting physiological health effects.
|
|
Front. Public Health
(Peer-reviewed journal)
|
Wind turbines and human health (2014)
The study found that when sited properly, EMF, shadow flicker, low-frequency noise, and infrasound from wind turbines are not related to adverse health.
|
|
Eurelectric
(Independent not-for-profit)
|
Griffin Wind Farm – SSE Renewables (Case Study)
Case Study on SSER Griffin Wind Farm (68 turbines, 2,500 ha) of successful biodiversity integration approach which resulted in A 66% uplift in biodiversity units when compared to pre-construction levels.
|
|
Environmental Research
(Peer-reviewed journal)
|
Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature (2021)
From a dataset of 88125 climate-related papers published since 2012, this study concludes with high statistical confidence that the scientific consensus on human-caused contemporary climate change exceeds 99% in the peer reviewed scientific literature.
|
Wind farms and agriculture
|
RE-Alliance
(Independent not-for-profit)
|
Wind turbines and farming – Lindsay Marriott
Lindsay Marriott, Gippsland sheep and cattle farmer, on his experience farming with wind turbines.
|
|
Farmers for Climate Action
(Independent not-for-profit)
|
Farmers for Climate Action - Farm powered: Opportunities for regional communities in the renewable energy boom (2022)
The report outlines the opportunities for renewable energy adoption on farms. For example: Wind turbines take up only around 3% of leased land allowing farmers to derive additional income as they continue their core business of producing food and fibre.
|
Land value
|
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
(Peer-reviewed journal)
|
The On-Farm and Near-Farm Effects of Wind Turbines on Agricultural Land Values (2020)
This study found that wind turbines have no statistically significant effect on agricultural land values in Kansas, either on-farm or nearby.
|
|
Energy Policy
(Peer-reviewed journal)
|
Commercial wind turbines and residential home values: New evidence from the universe of land-based wind projects in the United States (2014)
This study found that residential home values in the United States within 1 mile of a new wind turbine project lose about 11% in value after announcement, but impacts shrink to ~2% and statistically insignificant 9 years or more after project announcement (roughly 5 years after operation began). Homes located within 1–2 miles of a commercial wind turbine experience much smaller impacts and homes located farther than 2 miles away are unaffected.
|
|
Environmental and Resource Economics
(Peer-reviewed journal)
|
Wind Turbines and Property Values: A Meta-Regression Analysis (2023)
This meta-analysis of 25 studies finds that proximity to wind turbines reduces property values by about -0.68% at 1.9 miles, with no effect beyond 2.8 miles
|